25 Strangest Sights on Google Earth


Post 7973

25 Strangest Sights on Google Earth

Advertisements

China Powers Up the World’s Largest Alien-Hunting Telescope


Post 7972

China Powers Up the World’s Largest Alien-Hunting Telescope

Sunday 11:16am

 http://gizmodo.com/china-powers-up-the-worlds-largest-alien-hunting-telesc-1787056877
Screengrab: YouTube/Fraser Cain via FAST

You had a good run Arecibo, but there’s a new big dog in town. China has switched on the massive dish that now officially holds the record for the world’s largest single-aperture telescope. Among other things, researchers hope it will provide a big boost in the hunt for extraterrestrial life.

What’s been dubbed the “FAST” (Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope) officially began operating around noon yesterday. It’s 200 meters larger than the Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico which, at 305 meters, has dominated the telescope size game since the 1960’s. Just to give you an idea of the scale, FAST is roughly the size of 30 soccer fields.

FAST’s size matters. It’s tremendously powerful and has a field of vision that’s reportedly twice as large as the Arecibo Observatory. As far as sensitivity is concerned, the Chinese telescope is 10 times more powerful than its closest competitor, the 100-meter telescope near Bonn, Germany.

Peng Bo, a researcher at the National Astronomical Observatories, told China’s official Xinhua news agency that “FAST’s potential to discover an alien civilization will be five to 10 times that of current equipment, as it can see farther and darker planets.”

The telescope will also help scientists detect more pulsars. That means they will have greater capabilities when it comes to tracing gravitational waves or ripples in space-time which could lead to a better understanding of the evolution of galaxies and the origins of the universe.

Building such an enormous project comes at a price. Not only did China invest $180 million into the construction of the telescope, but it also hascontroversially relocated between nine and ten thousand residents of the Guizhou province. Those citizens were rehoused in the nearby counties of Pingtang and Luodian due to concerns of magnetic interference.

Chinese President Xi Jinping has made space exploration a top priority. In 2013, the country landed the first space rover on the moon since 1976. Plans have been set to build a space station by 2022 and land a man on the moon by 2036.

For the next two to three years, China’s astronomers will be given priority at FAST. It will later be opened to scientists around the globe.

[Al Jazeera]

Gizmodo weekend editor

Hubble Discovers New Evidence of Water Geysers on Europa


Post 7971

Hubble Discovers New Evidence of Water Geysers on Europa

Comparison of 2014 transit observations (left) and 2012 aurora observations (right) showing evidence of possible geyser activity near Europa’s south pole. Image: NASA, ESA, W. Sparks (left image) L. Roth (right image)

Jupiter’s moon Europa is on the shortlist of places we might discover alien life in our solar system. And today, the prospects for finding extraterrestrial microbes on this little ice moon got a lot better, when NASA unveiled new evidence for water geysers near Europa’s south pole. The discovery strengthens the case for a geothermally-heated, subsurface ocean.

“Today, we are presenting new Hubble evidence for water vapor plumes being expelled from the ice surface of Europa,” William Sparks, an astronomer with the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore said in a NASA press briefing this afternoon. “Observations indicate a global, saline liquid water ocean engulfs the moon at the present time. If there are plumes emerging, it is significant because it means we may be able to explore that ocean… without having to drill through miles of ice.”

The discovery, which will be published this week in the Astrophysical Journal, came about after a 15 month-long Hubble Space Telescope observational campaign, which saw Europa transit in front of Jupiter in the far ultraviolet on ten separate occasions. During three of those transit events, Hubble observed spectral features that could be plumes, mostly emanating from Europa’s south polar terrain.

Three transit images taken with the HST show statistically significant evidence for plume-like activity on Europa. Image: NASA, ESA, W. Sparks (STScI)

Today’s announcement marks the second time that astronomers have discovered signs of geyser activity on Europa. The first evidence came in late 2012, when a separate UV imaging analysis by Hubble revealed elevated levels of hydrogen and oxygen near the moon’s south pole. That data was taken to indicate two enormous plumes of water, jettisoning skyward to a height of 125 miles (200 km).

But the finding was never replicated—not by Hubble, nor in data captured by several Jupiter-bound spacecrafts—until now. This prompted speculation that Europa’s geologic activity is quite intermittent, perhaps only occurring during specific parts of its orbit around Jupiter, when the gas giant exerts a powerful tidal strain on the moon.

Hubble’s latest exciting clues—UV absorption features that could indicate water—seem to support this picture. “If the features are real, they have to be intermittent, because we did not see anything on seven occasions,” Sparks said.

Europa isn’t only the eruptive moon that might be sheltering warm, life-friendly waters beneath its frozen exterior. A little further down the cosmic street lies Enceladus, whose south pole plumes spew seawater full throttle all the time, offering free samples to any spacecraft that happen to be in the neighborhood. Cassini’s discovery of activity on Enceladus has prompted some astronomers to propose a dedicated astrobiology mission to the moon, which could sample that seawater for signs of life.

Artist’s concept for “chaos terrain” on Europa, with liquid water from a subsurface ocean seeping through cracks in the overlying ice. Image: Schmidt et al. 2011.

An Enceladus life finder mission has not yet been greenlit by NASA—but a mission to Europa is already in the works for the 2020s. Not only are the latest signs of activity sure to generate excitement for that mission, they could help us design it for the best possible results.

“I think one of the biggest unknowns we have [regarding the plumes] is understanding their timing,” a spokesperson for the Europa mission said during the press briefing. “The more observations we can get with Hubble and James Webb Space Telescope, the better we can develop a schedule to search for these plumes [when we’re] close.”

“We know that Europa is a special place,” Amanda Hendrix, an expert in icy moons and satellites with the Planetary Science Institute told Gizmodo. “The upcoming Europa mission will be awesome in how much it reveals about Europa as a world and its potential for habitability.”

Maddie is a staff writer at Gizmodo

The Biggest Threat to NASA’s Future Is the Ocean


Post 7970

The Biggest Threat to NASA’s Future Is the Ocean

 http://gizmodo.com/the-biggest-threat-to-nasas-future-is-the-ocean-1786443954

In October 2012, just a few days before Hurricane Sandy slammed into New Jersey, it was churning north past the narrow strip of white sand beach separating NASA’s most celebrated spaceport from the sea.

For several days and nights, heavy storm surge pounded the shoreline, flattening dunes and blowing sand right up to the launchpads. A stone’s throw away from the spot where a Saturn V rocket sent the first humans to the Moon, the ocean took a 100-foot bite out of the beach.

“I think the telling story is that the storm was almost 230 miles offshore, and it still had an impact,” Don Dankert, an environmental scientist at NASA, tells me as we stand with ecologist Carlton Hall atop a rickety metal security tower overlooking Space Coast. It is a hot, breathless day, and the surf laps gently at the deserted shore.

“It makes you wonder what would happen if a storm like that came in much closer, or collided with the coast,” Dankert adds.

That’s a troubling question for NASA, an agency whose most valuable piece of real estate—the $10.9 billion sandbar called Kennedy Space Center—is also its most threatened. The beating heart of American spaceflight since the Apollo program, Kennedy was, and still is, the only place on US soil where humans can launch into orbit. Today, the center is enjoying a revival, following a few dark years after the space shuttle program was mothballed and crewed launches were outsourced to Russia. The shuttle’s former digs, Launch Pad 39A, is being renovated by commercial spaceflight company SpaceX for the Falcon Heavy, a beast of a rocket designed to ferry astronauts into orbit and beyond. A few miles up the road, Launch Pad 39B is being modified for the SLS rocket, which NASA hopes will send the first humans to Mars.

But a glorious future of bigger and badder rockets is by no means assured. In fact, that future is gravely threatened, not by the budget cuts that NASA speaks speaks often and candidly about, but by climate change. If humans keep putting carbon in the atmosphere, eventually, Kennedy won’t be sending anybody into space. It’ll be underwater.

Aerial view of Kennedy Space Center’s two Launch Pads, 39A and 39B, along with the Launch Control Center, which includes the Vehicle Assembly Building. Launch Pad 41b is located at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station. Image: Josh Stevens/NASA Earth Observatory/USGS

“We are acutely aware that, in the long-term sense, the viability of our presence at Space Coast is in question,” says Kim Toufectis, a facilities planner in NASA’s Office of Strategic Infrastructure.

There’s a very good reason NASA built Kennedy Space Center, along with four other launch and research facilities, on the edge of the sea. If rockets are going to explode (and in 2016, they still do), we’d rather them explode over water than over people. “To launch to space safely, you have to be at the coast,” says Caroline Massey, assistant director for management operations at Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia.

Kennedy’s location, at the southern end of the Merritt Island wildlife refuge and just northwest of Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, has a few other perks. Launch pads and other resources are shared with the Air Force, and weather conditions are good year-round. Being close to the equator allows rockets to snag a bigger velocity boost from the rotation of the Earth.

And yet, even as architects were drawing up plans for Kennedy in the early 1960s, NASA knew the spaceport’s exposure—to rising sea levels, hurricanes, and the general wear and tear of the ocean—might one day cause catastrophic damage. “They were absolutely concerned about it,” says Roger Launius, associate director at the Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum and former chief historian for NASA. “But they wanted to launch over water. You don’t want to drop first stages over cities.”

Aerial view of Kennedy Space Center’s shoreline before any launchpads were installed, left (1943) and in modern history (2007). Photos Courtesy John Jaeger.

Now, that water is rising. Globally, sea levels have gone up about eight inches since the early 1900s. For the past two decades, the pace of rise has been quickening, in step with accelerated melting on the Greenland ice sheet. At Kennedy, conservative climate models project 5 to 8 inches of sea level rise by mid-century, and up to 15 inches by the 2080s. Models that take changing ice sheet dynamics into account predict as much as fifty inches (4.2 feet) of rise by the 2080s. In an even more dire scenario, Space Coast sees over six feet of rise by the end of the century, causing many of the roads and launchpads, not to mention sewers and buried electrical infrastructure, to become swamped. “I hope we don’t go there,” Hall said.

On top of rising seas, Kennedy faces a stormier future—more extreme hurricanes in the summer and nor’easters in the winter. “We started to notice a real issue with coastal erosion following the 2004 hurricanes,” says John Jaeger, a coastal geologist at the University of Florida.

Jaeger is part of a team of scientists who’ve been studying long-term shoreline recession at Space Coast, which can be traced back to the 1940s through aerial photographs. But while natural erosion has been reshaping Kennedy’s sandy fringes for decades, a recent uptick in powerful storms has Jaeger worried for the future. “As geologists, we know it’s these big events that do all the work,” he says.

NASA’s Climate Adaptation Sciences Investigators Workgroup (CASI) shares this concern. In a recent review of the space agency’s climate vulnerability, this team of in-house Earth scientists and facilities managers cited extreme weather and flooding as major hazards to future operations at Kennedy. Even under modest sea level rise scenarios, ten-year flood events are expected to occur two to three times as often by mid-century. And the more the ocean rises, the easier it’ll be for storms to cause flooding.

“I use the metaphor that a small change in the average can lead to a big change in extremes,” says Ben Strauss, vice president for sea level rise and climate impacts at Climate Central. “In basketball, it’s pretty hard to get a slam dunk, but if you raised the floor a foot, they would happen all the time.”

In other words, the coastal damage caused by Sandy may be a small taste of what Kennedy Space Center is in for.

After soaking in the view for a few moments, Dankert, Hall and I climb down from the watchtower and drive south to Kennedy’s dune restoration site, which was completed in 2014 with federal Hurricane Sandy relief funds. Stretching a little over a mile between Launch Complexes 39A and 39B, the dune’s grassy slopes rise like lightly yeasted bread over the sprawling beach. If you didn’t know better, you might think the shoreline had looked this way for centuries.

View along the beach of Kennedy Space Center’s dune restoration site in 2014. Photo Courtesy Dan Casper/NASA.

“We’re drawing a line in the sand,” Dankert says.“The dune not only prevents storm surge from plowing inland, it’s a sand source that replenishes the beach.”

It’s an astonishingly low-tech barrier when you consider the artificial pumping systems installed at Miami Beach to keep the ocean at bay, or theenormous seawalls some experts think we’ll need to save Manhattan. But in protecting its shoreline, NASA is trying to be considerate of all of its residents. In addition to rockets, Kennedy is home to a stunning array of wildlife, from bobcats and coyotes to southeastern beach mice, scrub jays, and gopher tortoises. It’s a major nesting site for protected leatherback, green, and loggerhead sea turtles, with thousands of baby turtles born on this small stretch of beach each year.

“We are a wildlife refuge—that is a huge part of our program,” Dankert says, adding that in addition to maintaining the shoreline, Kennedy’s newly-restored dune blocks artificial light from the launch pads, which can disorient female sea turtles as they’re coming ashore to nest.

For the past few years, the dune has held strong, preventing the ocean from spilling over onto the historic shuttle railroad that traces along the coast. Eventually, NASA would like to put in another two miles of dune, fortifying the entire shoreline between Launch Complexes 39A and 39B.

As with all government projects, the hang-up is funding. The post-Sandy dune reconstruction was completed for a cool $3 million, using beach-quality sand trucked up from Cape Canaveral. “We got really lucky—that sand was a big cost-saver,” Hall says, noting that the bill might have run in the tens of millions had NASA been forced to dredge sand from offshore.

An Atlas V rocket lifts off from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station’s Launch Complex 41, illumining nearby Kennedy Space Center’s dune restoration site. Photo Courtesy Tony Gray/NASA.

Still, ten, twenty, or even fifty million dollars pales in comparison to the value of the launchpads that sit just a quarter mile inland. “To rebuild a pad is a few billion dollars,” Hall says. “To spend a few million every few years instead is a pretty good investment.”

Although Kennedy is NASA’s most threatened asset, all of the space agency’s properties—some $32 billion worth of infrastructure used for scientific research, aeronautics testing, astronaut training, deep space missions, and vehicle assembly—face challenges in a changing climate. Sea levels at the Johnson Research Center in Texas are rising at a whopping 2.5 inches (6.4 centimeters) per decade, faster than any other coastal center by a factor of two or three. The Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans sits below sea level, surrounded by 19 foot-high levees, on rapidly-sinking ground. Inland facilities are bracing for more excessively hot days, and the Ames Research Center in Silicon Valley is preparing for a future of drought.

“This is a very large concern for our agency as a whole,” Toufectis says. And given our growing need to go into space, not just for scientific research, but to harness new resources, colonize other worlds, and monitor and study the one overburdened biosphere we’ve got, anything that threatens future operations and NASA threatens the entire nation.

At Wallops Flight Facility on Virginia’s eastern shore, climate change isn’t some existential problem for the future—it’s reality. The center’s sounding rocket launch pads, which have sent countless aircraft models and science experiments into suborbital space, sit on a six square-mile barrier island just a few hundred feet from the ocean, alongside two Virginia-owned pads used for satellite launches and ISS resupply runs. Sea levels are rising, storms are getting fiercer, and protective beaches are eroding rapidly. “We live with climate change every day,” Massey says.

Areas around five coastal NASA centers that would be inundated by 12 inches (30 cm) of sea level rise (red). Image: Josh Stevens/NASA Earth Observatory

Wallops Island started hardening its defenses in earnest in the ‘90s, when NASA erected a 3.5 mile stone seawall in front of the launch pads. But while the wall initially helped to reduce storm damage, the beach beyond it was soon worn to shreds. By the mid 2000s, storm waves were breaking directly against the wall, causing sections to crumble into the sea.

And so, in the spring of 2012 and the summer of 2014, with a $54 million investment from Congress, NASA and the US Army Corps of Engineers dredged almost 4 million cubic yards of sand from offshore, and a new beach was built beyond the wall. The impact was sudden and dramatic.

“When Hurricane Irene hit in 2011, Wallops [Island] was flooded, we had $3.8 million in storm damage, and we couldn’t work there for a few weeks,” Massey says. But when Sandy, virtually the same strength as Irene, blew past Virginia’s coastline a year later? “There was no island flooding to speak of, and we could have kept the power on the entire time,” Massey says. “The only difference was our shoreline protection program.”

At Wallops as at Kennedy, shoring up the shoreline every few years is considered an economical way to manage the risk right now. But looking out toward the late 21st century and beyond, NASA may be forced to leave some of these launchpads behind. “In the long-term, I would be shocked if we don’t see more than six feet of sea level rise,” Strauss says. “That amount may simply be incompatible with a lot of NASA’s coastal infrastructure.”

Picking up and moving inland, or “managed retreat” in the urban planning parlance, is the last thing the space agency wants to do. Ironically, it probably won’t be a major storm or flood that forces NASA’s hand. It’ll be its employees. You can’t have rocket launches on Space Coast if you can’t find engineers, mission directors and launch personnel willing to run them—which is to say, people willing to live and work in an increasingly hostile environment.

“The point at which we get serious about moving is the point at which the community is no longer viable,” Toufectis said.

Full-scale withdrawal at any of NASA’s centers is probably decades away. But at Wallops, the seeds of a managed retreat mentality are already starting to sink in. There’s now an intensive screening process for what can be built on the island: “It has to be something we can only do safely over water,” says Josh Bundick, program manager for management operations at Wallops.

Newer buildings are placed on elevated pilings or raised floors, with all critical electrical infrastructure installed above the flood line. Island operations are run by a skeleton crew, while the vast majority of Wallops employees work at the facility’s main base a few miles inland. NASA hasn’t broken off its relationship with Wallops Island, but it is creating distance.

As I head back to Kennedy’s visitor center, ogling the tremendous Vehicle Assembly Building where the Saturn V rocket was put together, I can’t help but feel a strange sense of cognitive dissonance. Here I am, at a place that radiates optimism, that flaunts the raw power of human technology that was built to explore the infinite, only to learn of man’s essential helplessness in the face of nature. The sense of two parallel realities grows stronger as I return to my hotel in Titusville, where gaggles of tourists take selfies with replica astronaut suits and locals share beers over the latest SpaceX gossip. This isn’t a community with any intention of going anywhere.

But no matter what the future holds for Space Coast, one thing is clear: defending this shoreline now isn’t a waste. Places on the front lines of climate change have lessons to teach us about standing one’s ground, and deciding when the ground can no longer stand. And those lessons may wind up being more valuable than a hundred launchpads.

“Look, human beings are all mortals,” Strauss says. “But that doesn’t stop us from leading meaningful lives. I could tell you that the barrier islands on the Atlantic coast may not survive this century and almost certainly won’t survive the next, but that doesn’t mean we can’t make good use of them now. We just have to keep our eyes open.”

Maddie is a staff writer at Gizmodo